Case Studies


The objective of the Res-AGorA project is to develop a comprehensive governance framework for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). In order to achieve this goal, the Res-AGorA project is conducting extensive case study research about existing RRI governance across different scientific technological areas, continuously monitors RRI trends in 16 European countries, and establishes a co-construction process with key stakeholders. This comprehensive work will generate the building blocks for the creation of a governance framework for RRI.

The empirical work programme and portfolio of case studies took place in 3 stages. All cases were interested in de-facto responsible governance of research and innovation, i.e. examples of the governance of research and innovation that had a responsibility dimension even if not explicitly referred to as Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). This page provides an overview of the Res-AGorA case studies. Finished cases are available for download. The transversal lessons derived from the case study analyses are summarized in a special report which summarizes the 13 lessons.

Download the Transversal Lessons Report here.

Stage 1 (Pilot Cases): September – December 2013

Klick here for Stage 2 Cases
Klick here for Stage 3 Cases

At Stage 1 the selection of cases was inductive and the cases explored understandings of responsibility, its contestation and operationalization in different research and innovation ‘situations’.

Integration of RRI in policy advice– the case of synthetic biology assessments (health; medical; food; agriculture; energy). Author: Davy van Doren, Fraunhofer ISI
RRI governance in Research Infrastructures (material sciences). Author: Mickael Pero, Fraunhofer ISI
Fracking in Austria (energy and carbon capture). Author: Alexander Lang, IHS Vienna
Nanosafety governance in the Netherlands (nanotechnology). Author: Bart Walhout, University of Twente
Responsibilisation phenomena relating the EC Code of conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research (health; medical; generic technology). Authors: Daniele Ruggiu, Elena Pariotti, Guido Gorgoni, Simone Arnaldi, University of Padua
Occupational health protection in standardisation experiences as an example of self-regulation (health; medical). Authors: Alessia Muratorio, Guido Gorgoni, Elena Pariotti, Simone Arnaldi, University of Padua
When ‘responsible’ becomes ‘irresponsible’: biofuels in the USA and Brazil (energy; agriculture; food). Authors: Sally Gee, Jakob Edler, University of Manchester
RRI in Russia: where society is silent and the state controls the floor. Author: Evgeny Klochikhin, University of Manchester [not yet published]

 

Stage 2 (development): February – April 2014

Klick here for Stage 1 Cases
Klick here for Stage 3 Cases

For Stage 2, case selection was refined to fur-ther inform the development of the Research Model. The Research Model was developed through analytical review of the literature incorporating lessons from the pilot cases. At Stage 2 the concepts proposed by the Research Model were refined and elaborated through the cases. Cases were selected to cover:

  • A variety of responsibility claims and their contestation.
  • Heterogeneous actor arrangements (actor constellations and governance instruments) involved in negotiating or implementing responsibility claims.
  • Practice and processes towards responsibilisation (or not). See below

Non-Mandatory Ethics Bodies at Austrian Universities (health; medical). Author: Erich Griessler, IHS Vienna

The responsibilisation and regulation of garage innovation open source 3D printing (advanced manufacturing). Author: Johan Söderberg, IFRIS
Linking responsible research and innovation on the farm: The case of Participatory Guarantee Systems (agriculture; food). Author: Allison Loconto, IFRIS
The responsibilisation and regulation of garage innovation: DIY-drug innovation in the psychonaut subculture (health). Author: Johan Söderberg, IFRIS
‘Fracking in Austria and the UK – A comparative study’ (geo-engineering; energy). Author: Alexander Lang, IHS Vienna
Responsible -> Irresponsible -> Responsible? Contestation & the re-design of governance instruments for US bioethanol (energy; agriculture; food; livestock). Authors: Sally Gee, Jakob Edler, Manchester University.
Anchoring knowledge transfer activities. The EC CoC and normative anchor points in laboratory practices in Italy (nano-toxicology). Authors: Simone Arnaldi, Alessia Muratorio, University of Padua
Horizontal Foresight to Address Societal Challenges in Danish Priority-setting for Strategic Research. Author: Morten Velsing Nielsen, Danish Board of Technology
Integration of RRI in policy advice– A review of the UK synthetic biology roadmap (health; medical; food; agriculture; energy). Author: Davy van Doren, Fraunhofer ISI

Stage 3 (final cases and completion): June 2014 – February 2015

Klick here for Stage 1 Cases
Klick here for Stage 2 Cases

For Stage 3, cases were selected to fill remaining empirical gaps in line with the Research Model. Selection at this stage was informed by transversal analysis of Stage 1 and 2 cases reported in Deliverable 3.5. Cases in Stage 3 focused on organisations central to the development of RRI understandings, practice and capacity building: multi-national corporations; research funding councils and institutes; and engineering professional associations. Care has been taken to look at the structural conditions and constraints which mitigate against RRI, i.e. situations where there are existing understandings of responsible research and innovation, which may, or may not, coincide with European Commission (for example) understandings of RRI. All cases considered the variety in interpretations of responsibility and institutionalisation processes.

[Note: Stage 3 cases are work in progress and will be uploaded shortly]

 

Responsibility and reflexivity in engineering: professional societies and codes of ethics (engineering). Authors: Simone Arnaldi, Alessia Muratorio, University of Padua
Institutionalising RRI – The case of a large re-search Organisation Authors: Kerstin Goos, Ralf Lindner, Fraunhofer ISI
Governance structures affecting data protection in advanced manufacturing – How much room does Germany’s ambition to lead the fourth industrial revolution leave for RRI? (advanced manufacturing) Authors: Daniel Bachlechner, Timo Leimbach, Fraunhofer ISI
‘Practicing RRI in NanoNextNL’ (nanotechnology). Author: Bart Walhout, University of Twente
‘Unhinged’ participation: The GM Vines Experiment in France (ag-bio). Author: Pierre-Benoit Joly, IFRIS
Critical Organisation-types, The ‘Good University’. Author: Sally Randles, University of Manchester
Critical organisations: Research Councils of UK. Authors: Kalle Stahl Nielsen, Sally Gee, Jakob Edler, University of Manchester
Critical organisations: Multi-national Corporations (ag-bio; consumer). Author: Allison Loconto, IFRIS
Small and Divided Worlds: A Systematic review and scientometric analysis of RRI literature. Authors: Elise Tancoigne, Sally Randles, Pierre-Benoit Joly, IFRIS and Manchester University
‘Voices Visions and Action of RRI’: Institutionalisation, Institutional Entrepreneurs and de-facto responsible research and innovation. Authors: Sally Randles, Elise Tancoigne, Kerstin Goos. University of Manchester, IFRIS, Fraunhofer ISI